#1 — Nathan Tarver

Years: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 44–48 | Total Points: 92.84

Tarver’s appeared in all five editions of the race, the only male runner in this group to do so, maintaining age-graded scores in the 73–77% range in four of those years. His 2021 debut at 44 was his fastest (18:06, 77.2%).

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 44.57/50 · Dominance Score: 28.27/30 · Participation Score: 20.00/20

#2 — Will Porter

Years: 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 20–22 | Total Points: 92.36

He debuted in 2022 at 20 with a 17:00 (5th male) and has gotten sharper every year, running 16:42 in 2023 — his fastest — before settling into the 16:45–16:49 range in 2024 and 2025. His 2025 finish of 2nd male in a field of 538 underscores just how fast he is relative to the field. Age-graded scores consistently in the 76–77% range.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 46.55/50 · Dominance Score: 29.82/30 · Participation Score: 16.00/20

#3 — Ryan Crandall

Years: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 27–31 | Total Points: 92.28

In four of his appearances, he’s been a top 11 performer, ranging from 17:01 to 18:14 with age-graded scores between 70 and 75%. His 2023 was his best (17:01, 75.3%, 7th male).

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 43.32/50 · Dominance Score: 28.96/30 · Participation Score: 20.00/20

#4 — Peter Kazery

Years: 2021, 2022, 2023 | Age range: 30–32 | Total Points: 89.42

He finished 2nd male overall in 2021 with a 16:04 (79.8% age-graded) — the fastest time among the men in this top 10 not named Ethan Kelley. He’s been consistent at that elite level across all three appearances, finishing 4th in both 2022 and 2023.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 47.63/50 · Dominance Score: 29.79/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#5 — Dominic Ward-McCammon

Years: 2022, 2023, 2025 | Age range: 19–22 | Total Points: 88.49

He entered the race and immediately made a statement: a 16:05 in 2022 (79.7% age-graded, 2nd male) that ranks among the single best performances in the event’s history. He’s been fast in every subsequent appearance.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 46.77/50 · Dominance Score: 29.72/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#6 — Cooper Fulton

Years: 2021, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 27–31 | Total Points: 87.87

Across four appearances spanning five years, his finish times have ranged just 18 seconds (18:15 to 18:33) and his age-graded scores have barely moved from a 69–70% band.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 42.70/50 · Dominance Score: 29.17/30 · Participation Score: 16.00/20

#7 — Evan Hallford

Years: 2022, 2023, 2024 | Age range: 14–17 | Total Points: 87.68

He debuted with an 18:03 (75.3% age-graded, 8th male). He improved in 2023 to a 17:27 (76.4%, 11th male) and again in 2024 to 17:12 (75.4%, 4th male).

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 46.24/50 · Dominance Score: 29.43/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#8 — Xavier Jacobs

Years: 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 33–36 | Total Points: 87.52

He has run four consecutive years and improved noticeably from his debut. His 2022 showing (18:53, 68.4%) was his slowest, and he’s been faster in every year since.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 42.68/50 · Dominance Score: 28.85/30 · Participation Score: 16.00/20

#9 — Daniel Scoggin

Years: 2021, 2023, 2024 | Age range: 31–34 | Total Points: 87.31

He has been excellent in his three appearances, with age-graded scores between 74.4 and 75.3% each time — among the tightest consistency bands in the top 10. He finished 4th male in his 2021 debut (17:07) and 5th in 2024 (17:14).

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 45.74/50 · Dominance Score: 29.56/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#10 — Ethan Kelley

Years: 2021, 2022 | Age range: 19–20 | Total Points: 86.67

The fastest single performance in the entire dataset — male or female. He won the 2021 race outright with a 15:44 at age 19, posting an 81.5% age-graded score. He returned in 2022 and finished 3rd male (16:23, 78.2%).

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 48.76/50 · Dominance Score: 29.91/30 · Participation Score: 8.00/20

Full Breakdown

#1 — Kelsey Shumate

Years: 2021, 2022, 2023 | Age range: 27–29 | Total Points: 91.43

Shumate took the overall female win in 2021 with a 19:35 — her fastest and highest age-graded effort (71%) — then returned in back-to-back years to finish 3rd and 2nd female respectively. Remarkably consistent across all three appearances.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 49.54/50 · Dominance Score: 29.88/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#2 — Andre Guedez

Years: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 28–32 | Total Points: 90.65

Guedez has been a model of consistency, hovering between 23:28 and 24:14 across four of her five races with age-graded scores tightly clustered around 59%. Her best performance came in 2022 (23:28), and she’s shown up year after year as a reliable top-20 finisher in an increasingly competitive field.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 42.10/50 · Dominance Score: 28.55/30 · Participation Score: 20.00/20

#3 — Nancy Min

Years: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 58–62 | Total Points: 88.23

Min has run all five editions of the race, and her age-graded scores (61–65%) are genuinely impressive relative to her peers.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 45.29/50 · Dominance Score: 22.94/30 · Participation Score: 20.00/20

#4 — Audrey Mayatte

Years: 2023, 2025 | Age range: 16–18 | Total Points: 87.86

The youngest runner in the top 10. Mayatte debuted at 16 with a 21:40 (3rd female) and returned two years later at 18 to post a 19:15 — a 2:25 improvement that earned her 2nd overall female and her best age-graded score of 72.6%.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 50.00/50 · Dominance Score: 29.86/30 · Participation Score: 8.00/20

#5 — Dorothy Wofford

Years: 2021, 2025 | Age range: 37–41 | Total Points: 87.21

In 2021 she finished 3rd female at 20:09 with a 71.2% age-graded score. Her 2025 return was a solid 22:01, good for 10th female and a 67% age-graded score. The gap between appearances makes the consistency impressive.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 49.63/50 · Dominance Score: 29.58/30 · Participation Score: 8.00/20

#6 — Elisabeth Gaillet

Years: 2021, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 25–29 | Total Points: 87.11

Gaillet has shown clear improvement over her four-year span. She debuted in 2021 with a 24:57 (55.7% age-graded). Her 2025 result in a field of 442 females underscores her growing competitive standing.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 42.48/50 · Dominance Score: 28.62/30 · Participation Score: 16.00/20

#7 — Jessica Diamond

Years: 2021, 2022 | Age range: 33–34 | Total Points: 85.89

Diamond put together back-to-back performances in the early years of the race that were nearly identical — 20:57 and 21:03, finishing 4th female both times, with age-graded scores of 67.2% and 67.1%.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 48.25/50 · Dominance Score: 29.64/30 · Participation Score: 8.00/20

#8 — Kara Hankins

Years: 2021, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 37–41 | Total Points: 85.54

Hankins has appeared across a wide span of years with solid times. Her 2021 debut at 37 (22:32, 12th female) remains her best raw time, though her age-graded scores have been comparable across all three races (~60–64%). Her standout result by field position came in 2024 when she finished 5th female in a field of 347.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 44.67/50 · Dominance Score: 28.87/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#9 — Savannah Turner

Years: 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 40–42 | Total Points: 85.42

Turner entered the race in 2023 and has improved her relative standing each year — dropping from 15th to 12th to 17th female in raw position, but finishing in a progressively larger field. Her best age-graded score came in 2025 (63.6% at age 42), and her raw time of 23:23 that year was also her fastest.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 44.59/50 · Dominance Score: 28.83/30 · Participation Score: 12.00/20

#10 — Catherine Holmes

Years: 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 | Age range: 58–61 | Total Points: 85.25

Her best year was 2023 (64.9% age-graded at 59), and she is notably consistent.

Point Breakdown: Speed Score: 45.45/50 · Dominance Score: 23.80/30 · Participation Score: 16.00/20

Here is the full breakdown: Watermelon Classic 5K Run - Female Rankings

What to Expect

The Watermelon Classic is a true community race. All skill levels show up, from competitive runners chasing fast times to walkers soaking in the holiday atmosphere. Finishing times tend to run fast, however I’ve never felt any pressure around pace or finish time.

The post-race spread is solid — plenty of snacks, drinks, and refreshments to help you recover after a hot July morning race. Bathroom capacity is also well handled, which is more than you can say for a lot of races this size.

The race has grown significantly in recent years, from around 570 finishers in 2021 to nearly 1,000 in 2025. The energy on the course reflects it — this one has momentum.

The Course

The 5K route starts on Lakeland Drive near I-55, loops through the Eastover area, and finishes at the Mississippi Sports Hall of Fame. For me, this course is hilly — about 154 feet of total gain —and when you factor in the heat and humidity, those rollers hit hard. The good news is the second half has more elevation loss than gain, so if you can get through the first mile and a half, you’ll find some relief.

The Heat Is Real

This is a July 4th race in Mississippi. That means by the time the gun goes off around 7:30 AM, it’s already warm and muggy. Heat management is part of racing the Watermelon Classic.

Here’s how I approach it:

• Hydrate the day before, not just the morning of. I’m already behind if I’m drinking water in the parking lot.

• Dress light.

• Start conservatively. The heat catches up fast if I go out too hard.

• Embrace the elements. Everyone around me is dealing with the same conditions. The shared struggle is part of what makes the finish line feel so good.

Get There Early

Given the growth in participation, I’d plan on arriving 30 to 45 minutes before the start, maybe even earlier if you did not pick your bib up the day before. It gives you time to get settled, do a proper warmup, and find your place at the starting line.

The Finish Line Is Worth It

Cross the finish line and you’ll be rewarded with something that makes perfect sense on a hot Mississippi morning: fresh, cold, sweet watermelon. It’s a simple touch, but it works. The post-race atmosphere is festive and relaxed, with runners celebrating the holiday together.

Should You Run It?

If you live in the Jackson area and you’ve been on the fence, sign up. The Watermelon Classic is the kind of race that reminds you why running is fun. It’s challenging enough to feel like an accomplishment, festive enough to feel like a celebration, and hot enough to make that watermelon taste like the best thing you’ve ever eaten.

Between 2020-2024, I analyzed 1,569 Gulf Coast Marathon finishes where runners had split timing data. By comparing the pace from the first six-mile split to the overall average pace, the pattern was unmistakable: runners who started aggressively paid a steep price in the final 20 miles.

Here’s what happened:

The typical runner slowed by 0.67 minutes per mile from their first split to their overall average pace. Only 7.6% managed to negative split, while 35.5% faded by more than a full minute per mile.

What Drives Your Marathon Pace?

I analyzed six factors across 1,500+ marathon finishes:

• Your demographics (gender and age)

• Race day temperature at the start

• How much temperatures rose during the race

• Whether you went out too fast in the first six miles

Here’s what I found: These six factors alone explained nearly half of the variation in finish times.

Think about that—with training plans, fueling strategies, gear choices, and hundreds of other variables at play, just these six factors capture about 43% of the performance puzzle. That tells you how much weather and pacing strategy really matter.

Here’s what stood out:

Temperature Change Matters More Than You Think

For every degree Fahrenheit the temperature rises during your race, you’ll slow down by about 1.6 seconds per mile (based on the regression coefficient of 0.027 minutes per mile).

What this means for a full marathon:

• 5°F warming = ~3.5 minutes slower overall (0.7 sec/mi × 26.2 miles)

• 10°F warming = ~7 minutes slower overall (1.6 sec/mi × 26.2 miles × 10°F)

• 15°F warming = ~10.5 minutes slower overall

Here’s the key insight: This is separate from the starting temperature effect (which adds 1.0 second per mile per degree). A race that starts at 60°F and climbs to 70°F hits you twice—once for starting in warmth, and again for the 10-degree rise during the race.

Going Out Fast Is Expensive

For every minute per mile you go out faster than your overall average pace, you pay a 1.4 minute penalty on your overall pace.

Translation: Start 30 seconds per mile too fast? You’ll likely finish 42 seconds per mile slower than if you’d paced evenly.

What This Means By Performance Level

Slower runners struggled more with pacing discipline. Among 4:30+ marathoners, 57% faded by more than a minute per mile, compared to 1.6% of sub-3:30 runners.

Temperature Made It Worse

On days with significant warming (>10°F), 51.2% of runners experienced severe fading versus 21.1% on cooler days. The combination of going out too fast PLUS rising temperatures was particularly brutal.

Practical Race Day Advice

1. Adjust Your Target Pace for Predicted Warming

If the forecast shows 10°F+ warming during your race:

Conservative approach: Start 15-20 seconds per mile slower than your goal pace

• A 10°F warming costs ~16 seconds per mile (1.6 sec/mile × 10°F)

• Add buffer for individual heat sensitivity and you’re looking at 15-20 sec/mi adjustment

Moderate approach: Start 10-12 seconds per mile slower

• Accounts for the direct temperature impact with minimal safety margin

• Best for runners who’ve trained in similar conditions

Aggressive approach: Start at goal pace but prepare mentally for 7-10 minute slowdown

• At minimum, acknowledge the warming will cost you time

• Don’t panic when you start slowing at mile 15-18

2. The First 10K Is Not a Victory Lap

Your watch will feel easy in the first 6 miles. That’s the point.

Rule of thumb: If you’re running more than 10-15 seconds per mile faster than your goal pace at mile 6, you’re borrowing time from mile 20-26—with interest.

The penalty is severe: For every minute per mile you go out too fast, you’ll pay a 1.4 minute per mile penalty overall. Go out 30 seconds too fast? Expect to finish 42 seconds per mile slower than if you’d started at goal pace.

3. Calculate Your Temperature Tax

The model reveals two separate temperature penalties:

Starting temperature: ~1 second per mile per degree F

• Racing at 60°F vs 50°F = 10 seconds per mile penalty (4.4 minutes total)

Temperature rise during race: ~1.6 seconds per mile per degree F

• 10°F warming during race = 16 seconds per mile penalty (7 minutes total)

Combined impact example:

• Start at 55°F, finish at 65°F (10°F rise)

• Starting temp penalty: 55°F × 1 sec/mi = 55 seconds/mile

• Warming penalty: 10°F × 1.6 sec/mi = 16 seconds/mile

• Total: 71 seconds per mile slower = 31 minutes over the full marathon

4. Know Your Personal Heat Tolerance

Traveling from a cool climate to a warm destination race? The model suggests you’re at higher risk for fade regardless of fitness.

Strategy for destination marathoners:

• Arrive 3-5 days early if possible for partial heat acclimation

• Prioritize hydration from 48 hours before the race

• Consider that your “training pace” was established in different conditions

5. Even Pacing Isn’t Conservative—It’s Smart

Only 39.6% of runners managed to stay within 30 seconds per mile of even pacing. But those who did likely finished closer to their potential.

The math is brutal: There is a 1.4× multiplier on aggressive starts.

• Start 20 seconds per mile too fast → finish 28 seconds per mile slower overall (20 × 1.4 = 28)

• Start 30 seconds per mile too fast → finish 42 seconds per mile slower overall

• Start 1 minute per mile too fast → finish 1:24 per mile slower overall

Even pacing eliminates this penalty entirely.

The Bottom Line

Marathon pacing is physiologically unforgiving, and weather amplifies the consequences of poor strategy.

If you’re racing Gulf Coast Marathon (or any marathon with potential warming):

1. Check the hourly forecast, not just the start time temperature

2. Calculate the predicted temperature change during your race window (typically 3-5 hours)

3. Add 1.6 seconds per mile for every degree of warming to your target pace

   • 5°F warming = add 8 sec/mi (3.5 min total)

   • 10°F warming = add 16 sec/mi (7 min total)

   • 15°F warming = add 24 sec/mi (10.5 min total)

4. Start conservatively—the penalty for going out too fast (1.4× multiplier) is worse than the temperature penalty

The runners who finish strong aren’t lucky. They’re disciplined in the first half and honest about the weather.

Across all Gulf Coast Marathon races in our dataset, temperature observations averaged 60.4°F with a median of 61°F. Conditions ranged from a low of 47°F to a high of 72°F, showing the significant variability runners face—a 25-degree spread. The standard deviation of 7.2°F indicates most temperatures clustered between 53°F and 67°F (one standard deviation from the mean). Half of all observations fell between 56.5°F and 66°F, representing the typical race-day window runners should prepare for.

Most running research suggests the ideal marathon temperature falls between 44°F and 59°F—cool enough to manage heat but warm enough to avoid excessive cold stress. Gulf Coast’s average of 60.4°F runs just above this optimal window, pushing the race into the heat-management zone for most runners. While some years dip into the ideal range with lows around 47°F, most race conditions trend warmer, with temperatures frequently climbing into the 65–72°F range where performance penalties accelerate. This consistent drift above the ideal threshold is precisely why Gulf Coast demands a weather-focused pacing strategy. As seen below, only two years saw race temps within the ideal range.

Temperature changes throughout the race day impact your performance. If conditions warm from morning to afternoon—which happens frequently at Gulf Coast—your body must continuously adapt to increasing heat stress. This dynamic warming is harder to manage than steady conditions because your pacing strategy becomes less predictable. Understanding how temperature will shift across the hours you’ll be racing allows you to anticipate when conditions will be most challenging and adjust your effort accordingly.

December generally features winds predominantly from the north, with average speeds around 7-9 mph. Runners are heading generally eastward/southeast from Pass Christian to Biloxi along the coast. If winds are from the north/northeast (typical for early December), runners would be experiencing a crosswind or slight headwind for much of the race depending on the exact course routing along Highway 90.

Understanding Gulf Coast Marathon’s weather patterns—temperature ranges, hourly warming trends, and wind conditions—transforms how you approach race day. The data shows you’ll likely start in the high 40s to low 50s and warm into the 60s-70s by mid-race, with most years experiencing 9-12°F of warming from start to finish. Add in the typical north/northeast winds creating a crosswind or headwind along the eastward coastal route, and you have a recipe that demands strategic pacing. Your training prepared you for the distance—now let the weather data prepare you for the conditions you’ll actually face.

Now that we understand Gulf Coast’s weather patterns, the next question becomes: how do these conditions actually impact different runners? Gender, age, and fitness level all influence how temperature affects your performance. In our next analysis, we’ll examine exactly how weather impacts finish times across demographic groups so you can build a personalized race strategy.

Here’s the registration link if you are interested in participating: Keesler Federal Mississippi Gulf Coast Marathon.

In this analysis, we’ll break down the data across four key areas. First, we’ll examine participation trends over the past five years. Then we’ll dive into finish times, showing you when most runners finish. Next, we’ll explore the weather patterns that define Gulf Coast race days and understand how conditions have varied year to year. Finally, we’ll connect all of this together with practical pacing suggestions based on forecasted weather, so you can build a race strategy that accounts for the conditions you’re likely to face.

Regarding participation trends, the race has an average of 504 finishers under 7 hours with a range of 410 to 615 total runners.

Most runners are between 30 and 50 years old.

Gulf Coast finishers cluster between 3:52 and 5:10 (the middle 50%), with a median finish of 4:30. The tight distribution around the 4–5 hour range reflects the race’s fast, flat course and attracts runners seeking achievable but competitive times. Elite finishers dip below 2:20 while the slowest exceed 7 hours, but most runners aim for that sweet spot of 4.5 hours.

Male finishers average 4:22 (median 4:18) while female finishers average 4:47 (median 4:45)—a 25-minute difference that mirrors typical marathon gender performance gaps. Statistical analysis confirms the gender gap in finish times is highly significant (p < 0.001), with females finishing 21–29 minutes slower on average than males. This will factor into the analysis of how weather impacts finish times.

Each box shows where most runners in that gender group finished. The line in the middle of each box is the median—the halfway point where 50% finished faster and 50% finished slower. The top and bottom edges of the box represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, meaning the box contains the middle 50% of all finishers. The thin lines extending above and below the box show the typical range of times, while the dots represent outliers—unusually fast or slow finishers who fall well outside the normal pattern.

Age group is also a driver of finish time. Across both genders, there’s a clear aging effect: runners aged 20-39 finish fastest, performance plateaus in the 40s, then slows noticeably in the 50s and 60s. Female runners aged 20-39 average 4:38-4:39, dropping to 4:56 in the 50s and 5:19 at 60+—a 40-minute spread. Male runners show a similar pattern: ages 20-39 average 4:15-4:16, increasing to 4:32 in the 50s and 4:49 at 60+—roughly a 35-minute spread. Statistical analysis confirms age is highly significant (p < 0.001).

So what emerges from this data? Gulf Coast attracts runners primarily between ages 30-50 who are capable of finishing in the competitive 4-5 hour window. Gender and age are both strong predictors of finish time, with roughly a 25-minute male advantage and a 35-40 minute spread between the youngest and oldest runners. These baseline patterns give us a framework for race planning, but here’s where weather becomes critical: these demographic and age-related patterns tell us only part of the story. The real variable that shifts finish times unpredictably from year to year is weather. Temperature, humidity, and wind don’t care about your gender or age—they impact every runner. In the next section, we’ll examine Gulf Coast’s weather history and discover how conditions have impacted performance over the years to help build personalized pacing strategies that account for the forecast you’re actually facing on race day.